Learn more about our management packages today —
Call toll free (888) 565-1226

New NC Supreme Court Case: Applicability of Condominium Act Foreclosure Rights to Pre-1986 Condominiums

A decision last week (November 4) by the NC Supreme Court provides helpful authority to older condominiums not only in the context of foreclosures, but in the larger context of relying on the retroactive portions of the NC Condominium Act (Chapter 47C).

In re Foreclosure of a Lien by Exec. Off. Park considered the issue of whether a pre-1986 condominium, formed pursuant to the NC Unit Ownership Act (Chapter 47A), has the power of sale for foreclosure as set forth in the Condominium Act. This right did not exist in the Declaration at issue or expressly in the Unit Ownership Act. Pre-October 1, 1986 condominiums cannot “opt in” to the Condominium Act in the way that pre-1999 planned communities can opt in to the Planned Community Act. However, the Condominium Act does make numerous portions of itself retroactive to all condominiums, whenever created. N.C.G.S. 47C-1-102(a) states that “47C-3-116 (Lien for Assessments)…….appl[ies] to all condominiums created in this State on or before October 1, 1986, unless the declaration expressly provides to the contrary.”  Here, nothing in the Declaration provided to the contrary–the Declaration did not prohibit non-judicial foreclosure. Thus, the Court held the community association could rely on the retroactive language for authority to pursue a nonjudicial foreclosure.

This case is important not just because of the foreclosure power, but because older Unit Ownership Act condominiums routinely rely on retroactive portions of the Condominium Act to conduct business. N.C.G.S. 47C-1-102(a) contains the full list of retroactive portions of the Condominium Act which help older communities operate. You can use this link to the Condominium Act, with all retroactive portions in bold. The retroactive portions include instruction and authority on issues ranging from eminent domain to the power to fine (and protections for owners), and condominiums boards and owners should consider these sections when interpreting the relative rights and responsibilities of associations and members.

NOTE: This decision by the NC Supreme Court overrules the prior decision of the Court of Appeals as summarized in this May 18, 2021 post: New NC Appellate Case: Executive Office Park of Durham Association, Inc. v Rock (Older Condo Collections).

If you have questions about this case, the Condominium Act or any other community association topic, please contact one of our attorneys in the community association practice group in Charlotte, Greensboro, Raleigh or Wilmington, North Carolina, or Columbia or Greenville, South Carolina.

Author: Harmony Taylor
Articles have been Reprinted with permission from Black, Slaughter, Black.

* These articles and related content on this website are provided without warranty of any kind and in no way constitute or provide legal advice. You are advised to contact an attorney specializing in Association Management for legal advice related to your specific issue and community. Some articles are provided by third parties and online services. Display of these articles does in no way endorse the products or services of Community Association Management by the author(s).